|
Battery A
|
|
|
|
|
Video/song
|
Length
|
Type
of videotape
|
Title
|
|
1.Cassius
|
3'9"
|
Conceptual
|
"1999"
|
|
2.Anna
Oxa
|
4'6"
|
Narrative
|
"Senza
pietà"
|
|
3.Madonna
|
3'56"
|
Conceptual
|
"Nothing
really matters"
|
|
4.Britney
Spears
|
3'52"
|
Executive
|
"Baby
on move time"
|
|
5.Alex
Britti
|
3'30"
|
Narrative
|
"Oggi
sono io"
|
|
6.Almanegretta
|
3'46"
|
Conceptual
|
"Re-born
cretin again"
|
|
Battery B
|
|
|
|
|
7.Janet
Jackson and Black Street
|
4'6"
|
Conceptual
|
"Girlfriend/boyfriend”
|
|
8.Biagio
Antonacci
|
3'29"
|
Narrative
|
"Quanto
tempo ancora"
|
|
9.Franco
Battiato
|
4'6"
|
Conceptual
|
"Shock
in my town"
|
|
10.Cardigans
|
3'30"
|
Executive
|
"Erase/rewind"
|
|
11.Irene
Grandi
|
3'46"
|
Narrative
|
"8
e mezzo"
|
|
12.Peplab
|
3'22"
|
Conceptual
|
"Ride
the pony"
|
Song
F1 males-F1 females 0.97
F2 males-F2 females 0.96
F3 males-F3 females 0.92
Video
F1 males-F1 females 0.98
F2 males-F2 females 0.31
F3 males-F3 females 0.61
Cross songs-videos (females)
F1 songs-F1 videos 0.96
F2 songs-F2 videos 0.98
F3 songs-F3 videos 0.98
Cross songs-videos (males)
F1 songs-F1 videos 0.99
F2 songs-F2 videos 0.87
F3 songs-F3 videos 0.75
Cross gender-modality (F1 only)
F1 songs (females)-F1 videos (males)
0.97
F1 songs (males)-F1 videos (females)
0.98
(*the values equal to or > 0.92 are significant)
Noteworthy is the strong resemblance of attitudes, especially
as concerns the first dimension, i.e., evaluation.
Cluster Analysis
10. The cluster analysis was applied to the distance matrix
1) between the songs, 2) between the videos, and 3) between the songs and the
videos. The Johnson max method was used: It is a new hierarchic method that
singles out the groups of data between which the highest similarity indices
exist.
Song Clusters
Clusters Index of Similarity
2-Oxa 0.46
3-Madonna
8-Antonacci
10-Cardigans 0.57-1.24
5-Britti
1-Cassius
7-Jackson 0.69-1.23
12-Peplab
4-Spears 0.89
11-Grandi
9-Battiato 1.48
6-Almanegretta
Video Clusters
Clusters Index of Similarity
6-Almanegretta 0.37-0.88
2-Oxa
9-Battiato
11-Grandi 0.73
4-Spears
1-Cassius
7-Jackson 0.81-1.31
3-Madonna
5-Britti
8-Antonacci 0.82-1.44
10-Cardigans
12-Peplab
Video and Song Clusters
Clusters Index of Similarity
4-Spears' song
16-Spears' video 0.21-0.89
11-Grandi's song
23-Grandi's video
1-Cassius' song
13-Cassius' video 0.23-1.34
7-Jackson's song
12-Peplab's song
9-Battiato's song
21-Battiato's video 0.33-1.02
14-Oxa's video
5-Almanegretta's video
5-Britti's song
20-Antonacci's video 0.38-1.50
17-Britti's video
6-Almanegretta's song
2-Oxa's song
3-Madonna's song 0.46-1.17
15-Madonna's video
7-Jackson's video
8-Antonacci's song
10-Cardigans' song 0.57-1.15
22-Cardigans' video
24-Peplab's video
Conclusion
11. The main objective of my study was to establish whether
the two most widely used and best known modalities of music reception by the
young public can actually arouse different emotions. Results show that videos
and songs shape a very similar attitude concerning both mean profiles
and factorial structure -- and partly also clusters. The latter show that the
participants have been able to perceive semantic and structural proximity between
the pieces presented in the two modalities: each cluster has at least one song-video
pair. So the two modalities of music reception do not seem to contrast each
other, but rather to be complementary. This leads us to wonder whether audiovisual
attention is primarily directed towards the relationship between music
and image. It is much more likely that the messages conveyed by the two channels
(the eye and the ear) are combined in a unitary way, as happens in movie communication,
producing an aesthetic or perceptual synthesis, in which there is no interference
but concordance between the meanings simultaneously conveyed by both components.
Works Cited
Baroni, M., and F. Nanni. Crescere Con il Rock
(Growing up with Rock Music). Bologna: Clueb, 1989.
Behne, K.E. Film, Musik, Video oder die Konkurrenz von Auge und Ohr.
Regensburg: Bosse, 1987.
Burns, G., and R. Thompson. "Music Television and Videos: Historical and Aesthetic
Considerations." Popular Music and Society 13 (1987): 11-25.
Cupchik, G.C., and M. Saltzman. "Reception and Memory for Serious and Light
Rock Music Videos." Empirical Studies of the Arts 17 (1999): 59-72.
Fry, D.L., and Fry, V.H.. "Some Structural Characteristics of Music Television
Videos." The Southern Speech Communication Journal 52 (1987): 151-64.
Greeson, L.E. "Recognition and Ratings of Television Music Videos: Age, Gender
and Sociocultural Effects." Journal of Applied Psychology 23 (1991):
1908-20.
Roe, L., and M. Lofgren. "Music Video Use and Educational Achievement." Popular
Music 7.3 (1988): 298-324.
Schwichtenberg, C. "Music Videos: The Popular Pleasures of Visual Music." Popular
Music and Communication. Ed. J. Lull. London: Sage, 1992. 119-30.
Seidman, S.A. "An Investigation of Sex-Role Stereotyping in Music Videos." Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 36 (1992): 209-16.
Sherman, B.L. "Perceiving and Processing Music Television." Responding to
the Screen: Reception and Reaction Processes. Ed. J. Bryant and D. Zillman.
Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991. 316-34.
Springsklee, H. "Video-Clips. Typen und Auswirkungen." Film-Music. Videoclip
oder die Konkurrenz von Auge und Ohr. Ed. K. Behne. Regensburg: Gustav Bosse,
1987. 127-54.
Stockbridge, S. "Rock Videos: Pleasure and Resistance. Television and Women's
Culture: Politics of the Popular Communication and Human Values. Ed. M.
Brown. London: Sage, 1990. 102-04.
Tessarolo, M. "La Musica dei Giovani: Analisi degli Atteggiamenti Verso
la Musica Pop/Rock ("Young People's Music: An Analysis of Attitudes toward Pop/Rock
Music"). Sociologia della Comunicazione 15 (1991): 137-46.
Tessarolo, M., and E. Kermol. La Musica del Cinema. Roma: Bulzoni, 1996.
to top of page